RESUMEN
Background: The rapid development of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines has been a remarkable success of the COVID-19 pandemic, but vaccine-induced immunity is heterogeneous in immunocompromised populations. We sought to determine the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in a cohort of people with idiopathic CD4 lymphopenia (ICL). Method(s): 25-patients with ICL followed at the National Institutes of Health on a natural history protocol were evaluated between 2020-2022. Blood and serum was collected within 4-12 weeks after their second and/or third SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine dose. Twenty-three matched healthy volunteers (HVs) provided blood samples at similar timepoints post-mRNA vaccination on a separate clinical protocol. Pre-vaccine blood samples were also used when available. Anti-spike and anti-receptor binding domain antibodies were measured. T-cell stimulation assays were performed to quantify SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses. Comparisons were made with Wilcoxon test. Result(s): Twenty-participants with ICL had samples collected after their second mRNA vaccine and 7-individuals after the third dose. Median age at vaccination was 51-years (IQR: 44-62) and 12 were women (48%). Median CD4 T-cell count was 150 cells/muL (IQR: 85-188) at the time of vaccination, and 11-individuals (44%) had a baseline CD4 count <=100 cells/muL. HVs had a median age of 54-years (IQR: 43-60) with 13-women (56.5%). Anti-spike IgG antibody levels were significantly greater in HVs than those with ICL after 2-doses. Lower SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody production was primarily observed in those with baseline CD4 T-cells <=100 cells/mul (Figure-1A). The decreased production in ICL remained after a third vaccine dose (Figure-1B). There was a significant correlation between anti-spike IgG and baseline CD4 count. Spike-specific CD4 T-cell responses in volunteers compared to those with ICL demonstrated similar levels of activation induced markers (CD154+CD69+) and cytokine production (IFNgamma+, TNFalpha+, IL2+) after two or three mRNA vaccine doses. Quantitatively the smallest responses were observed in those with lower baseline CD4 T-cells (Figure 1C-D). Minimal SARS-CoV-2 CD8 T-cell responses were detected in both groups. Conclusion(s): Patients with ICL and baseline CD4 T-cells >100 mount similar humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination as healthy volunteers. Those with baseline CD4 T-cells <=100 have impaired vaccine- induced immunity and should be prioritized to additional boosters and continue other risk mitigation strategies. (Figure Presented).
RESUMEN
Background: T cells play a critical role in the adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in both infection and vaccination. Identifying T cell epitopes and understanding how T cells recognize these epitopes can help inform future vaccine design and provide insight into T cell recognition of newly emerging variants. Here, we identified SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell epitopes, analyzed epitope-specific T cell repertoires, and characterized the potency and cross-reactivity of T cell clones across different common human coronaviruses (HCoVs). Method(s): SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell epitopes were determined by IFNgamma ELISpot using PBMC from convalescent individuals with mild/moderate disease (n=25 for Spike (S), Nucleocapsid (N) and Membrane (M)), and in vaccinated individuals (n=27 for S). Epitope-specific T cells were isolated based on activation markers following a 6-hour peptide stimulation, and scRNAseq was performed for TCR repertoire analysis. T cell lines were generated by expressing recombinant TCRs in Jurkat cells and activation was measured by CD69 upregulation. Result(s): We identified multiple immunodominant T cell epitopes across S, N and M proteins in convalescent individuals. In vaccinated individuals, we detected many of the same dominant S-specific epitopes at similar frequencies as compared to convalescent individuals. T cell responses to peptide S205 (amino acids 817-831) were observed in 56% and 59% of individuals following infection and vaccination, respectively, while 20% and 19% of individuals responded to S302 (a.a. 1205-1219) following infection and vaccination, respectively. For S205, a CD4+ T cell response, we confirmed 8 unique TCRs and determined the minimal epitope to be a 9mer (IEDLLFNKV). While TCR genes TRAV8-6*01 and TRBV30*01 were commonly utilized across the TCRs, we did identify TCRs with unique immunogenetic properties with different potencies of cross-reactivity to other HCoVs. For S302, a CD8+ T cell response, we identified two unique TCRs with different immunogenetic properties that recognized the same 9mer (YIKWPWYIW) and cross-reacted with different HCoV peptides (Figure 1). Conclusion(s): These data identify immunodominant T cell epitopes following SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination and provide a detailed analysis of epitope-specific TCR repertoires. The prospect of developing a vaccine that broadly protects against multiple human coronaviruses is bolstered by the identification of conserved immunodominant SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes that cross react with multiple other HCoVs.
RESUMEN
[Figure: see text].